Paper |
Title |
Page |
MOPOPA03 |
Beam-Transient-Based LLRF Voltage Signal Calibration for the European XFEL |
80 |
|
- N. Walker, V. Ayvazyan, J. Branlard, S. Pfeiffer, Ch. Schmidt
DESY, Hamburg, Germany
|
|
|
The European XFEL linac consists of 25 superconducting RF (SRF) stations. With the exception of the first station which is part of the injector, each station comprises 32 1.3-GHz SRF TESLA cavities, driven by a single 10-MW klystron. A sophisticated state-of-the-art low-level RF (LLRF) system maintains the complex vector sum of each RF station. Monitoring and maintaining the calibration of the cavity electric field (gradient) probe signals has proven critical in achieving the maximum energy performance and availability of the SRF linac. Since there are no dedicated diagnostics for cross-checking calibration of the LLRF system, a procedure has been implemented based on simultaneously measuring the beam transient in open-loop operation of all cavities. Based on methods originally developed at FLASH, the European XFEL procedure makes use of automation and the XFEL LLRF DAQ system to provide a robust and relatively fast (minutes) way of extracting the transient data, and is now routinely scheduled once per week. In this paper, we will report on the background, implementation, analysis methods, typical results, and their subsequent application for machine operation.
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-LINAC2022-MOPOPA03
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 13 August 2022 — Revised ※ 23 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 14 September 2022 — Issue date ※ 27 September 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|
THPOPA26 |
Machine Learning Assisted Cavity Quench Identification at the European XFEL |
798 |
THOPA09 |
|
|
- J. Branlard, A. Eichler, J.H.K. Timm, N. Walker
DESY, Hamburg, Germany
|
|
|
A server-based quench detection system is used since the beginning of operation at the European XFEL (2017) to stop driving superconducting cavities if they experience a quench. While this approach effectively detects quenches, it also generates false positives, tripping the accelerating stations when failures other than quenches occur. Using the post-mortem data snapshots generated for every trip, an additional signal (referred to as residual) is systematically computed based on the standard cavity model. Following an initial training on a set of such residuals derived from quench as well as non-quench events, two independent machine learning engines analyze routinely the trip snapshots and their residuals to identify if a trip was indeed triggered by a quench or has another root cause. The outcome of the analysis is automatically appended to the data snapshots and distributed to a team of experts. This constitutes a fully deployed example of machine-learning-assisted failure classification to identify quenches, supporting experts in their daily routine of monitoring and documenting the accelerator uptime and availability.
|
|
|
Slides THPOPA26 [0.695 MB]
|
|
|
Poster THPOPA26 [0.975 MB]
|
|
DOI • |
reference for this paper
※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-LINAC2022-THPOPA26
|
|
About • |
Received ※ 19 August 2022 — Revised ※ 24 August 2022 — Accepted ※ 01 September 2022 — Issue date ※ 01 September 2022 |
Cite • |
reference for this paper using
※ BibTeX,
※ LaTeX,
※ Text/Word,
※ RIS,
※ EndNote (xml)
|
|
|